Case study / Google Ads
A forged-wheels PMax account moved from mixed demand toward clearer brand and non-brand separation. The result was a cleaner read on acquisition quality and a ROAS lift from 3.26 to 9.01.
ROAS movement from the logo-wall proof summary.
Problem
Action
Result
A forged-wheels PMax account moved from mixed demand toward clearer brand and non-brand separation. The result was a cleaner read on acquisition quality and a ROAS lift from 3.26 to 9.01.
Mixed PMax demand made it hard to read true paid acquisition performance.
Separated brand and non-brand demand to clarify acquisition quality.
ROAS lifted from 3.26 to 9.01.
The Decision-to-Outcome System
This google ads case is presented through the same five stages: diagnose the constraint, validate the evidence, decide the move, execute it, and prove the change.
Find the commercial constraint before choosing a channel task.
Input: Website, account, tracking, feed, margins, demand, or buyer prompts.Check the data, economics, demand, and implementation reality behind it.
Output: Trusted baseline, attribution, margins, lead quality, stock, and access limits.Choose the highest-leverage move and make the trade-offs explicit.
Output: One priority, target metric, assumptions, exclusions, and decision date.Ship the smallest coherent intervention that can change the outcome.
Output: Owner, sequence, dependencies, approvals, and validation method.Read the result against revenue, margin, pipeline, or qualified demand.
Output: Metric movement, confidence, exclusions, unintended effects, and next decision.Repeat: evidence from Prove becomes the next Diagnose input.
.svg)