SEO Pricing
SEO pricing follows the same three-stage path: Free Growth Map, Decision Sprint, and Execution Partnership. Commitment grows only when the evidence and implementation decision justify it.
The published $200 detailed analysis and $350 deep audit remain available when that exact work fits the Decision Sprint. They are scope detail, not a competing first step.
Engagement path and scope
Start with the smallest commitment that can answer the next decision. The existing published audit offers remain lower-level scope options inside the Decision Sprint when they fit.
Stage 1
$0
A no-access first pass that routes the likely organic-growth constraint and decides whether deeper evidence is justified.
Stage 2
Scoped after the Free Growth Map
A focused evidence sprint that validates the baseline, priority constraint, and implementation decision before larger SEO work.
Stage 3
Scoped after the Decision Sprint
Accountable implementation or ongoing SEO support after the Decision Sprint has clarified what should be shipped and measured.
Published scope detail
$200
A focused paid read and action plan when this exact evidence package fits the Decision Sprint.
Published scope detail
$350
A deeper diagnostic for traffic drops, competitor gaps, local visibility issues, or overlapping technical and content problems.
Decision output
The Decision Sprint is meant to produce a clear read on what blocks organic growth. It can surface technical SEO constraints, content gaps, indexation issues, internal linking problems, competitor pressure, and implementation priorities.
When the exact scope fits, the current published detail remains $200 for the detailed analysis and $350 for the deep audit plus competitor comparison. After the decision is validated, the next step can be one-off implementation, an Execution Partnership, a smaller test, or pausing work that would waste the next cycle.
Scope drivers
Scope changes when the site, market, and implementation reality change.
Indexation problems, broken architecture, thin templates, duplicate pages, migrations, and technical debt change the scope quickly.
Some sites need new pages. Some need better existing pages. Some need search intent, BOFU structure, or internal links fixed before more content is useful.
Competitive markets may require backlink planning, proof improvements, stronger comparison pages, or clearer commercial positioning.
SEO plans fail when nobody can ship the fixes. CMS access, developer support, approval speed, and content capacity affect the right scope.
Proof matched to risk
These cases show constraint-led SEO work tied to business outcomes instead of traffic promises.
A B2B email agency stopped a seven-month organic slide, moved tech health from 53 to 89, and doubled traffic.
Read caseLead qualityA US oil and gas SaaS restored 2+ qualified leads per month with technical cleanup, BOFU pages, links, and CRO.
Read caseConstrained ecommerceA kitchen cabinets site grew organic sessions from 336 to 1,262 while working through budget and implementation limits.
Read caseBefore the call
Use these answers to decide whether the first step should be a light read, a paid analysis, or a deeper audit.
The audit is enough when the decision is still unclear. If the constraint is already obvious and the team can ship, implementation can be scoped after the first review.
No. The audit can include priorities and time estimates, but implementation pricing depends on what the site needs and what the client can ship internally.
The deep audit includes competitor benchmarking. The lighter or $200 analysis can include competitor context, but the depth should match the budget and decision.
Yes. If the paid audit is too generic, too broad, or not useful enough to act on, the current offer includes a refund guarantee. It does not guarantee rankings, traffic, or revenue.
Next step
Use the Free Growth Map to route the problem, then validate the SEO decision through a scoped Decision Sprint before implementation or ongoing execution is priced.
.svg)